Develop an argument

Definition

To develop an argument means to construct a coherent and persuasive stance on a specific issue, supported by evidence and logical reasoning. This process involves formulating a clear thesis, presenting claims that support that thesis, and backing those claims with relevant data or examples to strengthen the overall position. Effective argument development also anticipates counterarguments and addresses them thoughtfully to enhance credibility.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Developing an argument requires clarity in defining the main claim or thesis, which guides the direction of the entire discussion.
2. Strong arguments are supported by various types of evidence, such as statistics, expert opinions, anecdotes, or historical examples.
3. Anticipating and addressing counterarguments is a critical component of developing a robust argument, as it demonstrates thorough understanding and strengthens credibility.
4. The structure of an argument typically includes an introduction that presents the thesis, body paragraphs that elaborate on claims and evidence, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points.
5. Effective communication of an argument involves not just logical reasoning but also persuasive language and rhetorical strategies to engage the audience.

Review Questions

• How can a clear thesis statement enhance the development of an argument?
  • A clear thesis statement serves as the backbone of an argument, providing a specific focus for all supporting claims. It allows the writer to stay on track and ensures that each piece of evidence presented is relevant to the central point being made. A well-defined thesis helps guide the audience's understanding, making it easier for them to follow the logic of the argument and appreciate its significance.
• In what ways does addressing counterarguments contribute to a more persuasive argument?
  • Addressing counterarguments is essential because it demonstrates that the writer has considered multiple perspectives on the issue. By acknowledging opposing viewpoints, the writer can refute them with evidence or logical reasoning, which enhances their credibility and shows critical thinking. This approach not only reinforces the original position but also builds trust with the audience by showing that the writer is open-minded and fair in their analysis.
• Evaluate how different types of evidence can affect the overall effectiveness of an argument.
  • Different types of evidence can significantly influence how persuasive an argument is perceived to be. For example, statistical data provides concrete support that can lend authority to a claim, while personal anecdotes may evoke emotional responses from the audience. A balanced use of diverse evidence types can cater to both logical reasoning and emotional appeal, making the argument more compelling overall. Evaluating and integrating various evidence sources effectively showcases the depth of research and strengthens the writer's position.

Related terms

Thesis Statement:

A concise summary of the main point or claim of an argument, serving as the foundation for the entire discussion.

Evidence: The information, facts, or data that support a claim within an argument, helping to establish its validity.

Counterargument: An opposing viewpoint or argument presented in response to the main argument, which can be addressed to reinforce the original position.